Re: RexRay follow up
I’m glad to see the strong alignment between Rex-Ray and CSI.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Would it make sense for Rex-Ray to be even more closely aligned with CSI, i.e. as a set of libraries and tools for people wanting to build CSI implementations. For example, CSI has a placeholder repo (see https://github.com/container-storage-interface/libraries) for libraries and tools. Similar to the Kubernetes incubator repo. Could RexRay become part of that or does it need to be its own top-level project? I worry about confusing developers and end-users with another CNCF project that attempt to achieve the same goal — CSI.
|
|