Can we get the phrase "cat poop" added to the formal CNCF definition of Sandbox? That would make our governance docs much more interesting to read.


thanks
-Doug
_______________________________________________________
STSM | IBM Open Source, Cloud Architecture & Technology
(919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@...
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog

"Bryan Cantrill" ---02/08/2018 05:24:38 AM---I'm sorry to have missed the call this week, but I think the term "Sandbox" is great -- in addition

From: "Bryan Cantrill" <bryan@...>
To: cncf-toc@...
Cc: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Date: 02/08/2018 05:24 AM
Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] [PAUSE] INCEPTION
Sent by: cncf-toc@...

---

I'm sorry to have missed the call this week, but I think the term "Sandbox" is great -- in addition to its positive connotations of fun and play, it's also dirty and filled with sniffling toddlers, broken plastic toys, and the occasional cat poop.  Much, much better than "inception"!

        - Bryan


On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:48 PM, alexis richardson <alexis@...> wrote:

Hi all

In this week's TOC we converged on some possible changes to the
Inception tier, that can address issues that have been raised about
market perception & confusion.  It is most likely that Inception will
be replaced with a "Sandbox" tier.

Chris Aniszczyk is drafting a written statement proposing Sandbox and
associated changes and clarifications.  This will include much of the
discussion from the Zoom Chat on this week's TOC call.  This draft is
under active editing now:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MkuVT7Q6itn9ESW-iyqIXsEqTPBrStXlvzESg94933A/edit

Until the TOC has reviewed the Sandbox proposal we shall suspend
voting on Inception projects.  I apologise for any delays that are
caused by this.  For the avoidance of further confusion, Sandbox will
be presented *as soon as possible* which I hope means at the next TOC
call.

alexis






On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Yang Guan via Lists.Cncf.Io
<yangguan=google.com@lists.cncf.io> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>