Re: prometheus

alexis richardson

Great point - worth pursuing on the Incubation thread.

On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 17:38 Rob Hirschfeld via cncf-toc, <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
RE: process & incubation.

Sorry to come in late.  My experience is that community may consider graduation from incubation as assured.  I agree that it's intended to be a "maybe" but that can be hard to control once the message gets out and expectations are set.

On 04/14/2016 09:11 AM, John Lawler via cncf-toc wrote:

Prometheus is a fine system but it is certainly not the only only one out there. Sysdig, for example, is also open source and covers much of the same ground. My down vote is not about Prometheus or Sysdig or any other project, but rather about the willy nilly process. I really thing that there should be a lot more discussion on this any any other such proposals.


From: <cncf-toc-bounces@...> on behalf of Solomon Hykes via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...>
Reply-To: Solomon Hykes <solomon.hykes@...>
Date: Thursday, April 14, 2016 at 12:07 PM
To: Jonathan Boulle <jonathan.boulle@...>
Cc: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] prometheus


On Wednesday, April 13, 2016, Jonathan Boulle via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:

I'd love to see Prometheus present soon, so please LMK if that is a good or bad thing.


cncf-toc mailing list

cncf-toc mailing list


Rob Hirschfeld, 512-773-7522
RackN CEO, Founder

I am in CENTRAL (-6) time
twitter: @zehicle, github: cloudedge & ravolt 
cncf-toc mailing list

Join { to automatically receive all group messages.