Re: prometheus

Brian Grant

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:11 AM, John Lawler via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:

Prometheus is a fine system but it is certainly not the only only one out there. Sysdig, for example, is also open source and covers much of the same ground. My down vote is not about Prometheus or Sysdig or any other project, but rather about the willy nilly process. I really thing that there should be a lot more discussion on this any any other such proposals.

If we're going to figure out the proposal process, we need a proposal to start with, IMO. 

This thread is merely an expression of interest in a proposal. We don't know whether the project is interested.

sysdig is great. And complementary to prometheus. Besides, we've previously agreed that we could accept overlapping projects. 

Maybe this was the reasoning by work groups: to gather a group of people to look for candidate projects within a particular subdomain, with a goal of producing a proposal (or multiple proposals) at the end.


From: <cncf-toc-bounces@...> on behalf of Solomon Hykes via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...>
Reply-To: Solomon Hykes <solomon.hykes@...>
Date: Thursday, April 14, 2016 at 12:07 PM
To: Jonathan Boulle <jonathan.boulle@...>
Cc: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] prometheus


On Wednesday, April 13, 2016, Jonathan Boulle via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:

I'd love to see Prometheus present soon, so please LMK if that is a good or bad thing.


cncf-toc mailing list

cncf-toc mailing list

Join { to automatically receive all group messages.