Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

Sam Lambert <samlambert@...>

Apologies, my vote is binding.

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:19 AM, Sam Lambert <samlambert@...> wrote:
+1 non-binding.

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:55 AM, alexis richardson <alexis@...> wrote:
Here is my 



On Thu, 18 Jan 2018, 04:36 Brian Grant via Lists.Cncf.Io, <> wrote:
Contributor diversity is not an explicit criterion at the incubation stage:

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 7:58 PM, Dan Kohn <dan@...> wrote:
I think the biggest concern is that Buoyant continues to dominate development given that other companies are generally making small patches rather than becoming major contributors. Chart:

Please note that non-binding votes are encouraged.

Dan Kohn <dan@...>
Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 10:24 PM, Duncan Johnston-Watt <> wrote:
I don't have a binding vote either but I am curious given linkerd's impressive stats why it isn't being promoted?



On 17 January 2018 at 20:59, Brandon Dimcheff via Lists.Cncf.Io <> wrote:
I don't have a vote, but I'd love to see linkerd remain a CNCF project.

- brandon

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 2:20 PM William Morgan <william@...> wrote:
FWIW that article is not 100% correct. Linkerd ships with a control plane (Namerd). This is how these companies are controlling routing policy across Linkerd instances.


On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 10:06 AM, Brian Grant via Lists.Cncf.Io <> wrote:
Different projects make different design tradeoffs.

Also, these 2 projects aren't directly comparable.

This article explains the difference pretty well:

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 9:31 AM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...g> wrote:
CNCF allows for competing projects, see our TOC principles for more information on this:

Istio currently isn't an official CNCF project but has been invited to formalize a project proposal.

For the merits of one project over another, I'd advise you to speak to the respective project communities for that information.

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 11:10 AM, Santosa, Andy <asantosa@...> wrote:
Hi Chris,
Personally, I would like to get clarification of competing component: linkerd vs istio. I learnt for example one company I met in KubeCon converting from linkerd to istio.


From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...g>
Reply-To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...>
Date: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 at 8:38 AM
To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

Hey TOC and community, we are requesting a vote to keep linkerd ( as an inception project for another year based on their presentation yesterday. Here are some stats shared yesterday from the linkerd community:

* 60+ contributors; 50+ releases (2--4 week cadence); 3400+ GH stars
* 1.5m+ Docker Hub pulls; 5--10 billion requests a day
* 1400+ Slack members
* 40+ companies using Linkerd in production. Public ones include Monzo, CreditKarma, Salesforce, Expedia, BigCommerce, NCBI, PayPal, Taboola, FOX, and AOL
* Powers the Human Genome Project!

Please vote +1/-1 (remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support).

Also note that every inception project has to be reviewed on an annual basis to decide whether it will continue to be a CNCF project or potentially graduate to another level. We will have another discussion in the near future about moving/graduating linkerd to another level, along with other CNCF projects.


Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719


Duncan Johnston-Watt

Founder & Chair, Advisory Board

Phone: +44 777 190 2653 | Skype: duncan_johnstonwatt

Twitter: @duncanjw | LinkedIn:

Cloudsoft Logo.jpg

Stay up to date with everything Cloudsoft:

Twitter_Logo_White_On_Blue.png YouTube-social-icon_red_48px.png

Join { to automatically receive all group messages.