Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

Doug Davis <dug@...>

+1 to keeping it - non-binding

STSM | IBM Open Source, Cloud Architecture & Technology
(919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@...
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog

"Dan Kohn" ---01/17/2018 10:58:41 PM---I think the biggest concern is that Buoyant continues to dominate development given that other compa

From: "Dan Kohn" <dan@...>
To: cncf-toc@...
Date: 01/17/2018 10:58 PM
Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018
Sent by: cncf-toc@...

I think the biggest concern is that Buoyant continues to dominate development given that other companies are generally making small patches rather than becoming major contributors. Chart:

Please note that non-binding votes are encouraged.

Dan Kohn <dan@...>
Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 10:24 PM, Duncan Johnston-Watt <duncan.johnstonwatt@...> wrote:
    I don't have a binding vote either but I am curious given linkerd's impressive stats why it isn't being promoted?



On 17 January 2018 at 20:59, Brandon Dimcheff via Lists.Cncf.Io <> wrote:
I don't have a vote, but I'd love to see linkerd remain a CNCF project.

- brandon

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 2:20 PM William Morgan <william@...> wrote:
    FWIW that article is not 100% correct. Linkerd ships with a control plane (Namerd). This is how these companies are controlling routing policy across Linkerd instances.


    On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 10:06 AM, Brian Grant via Lists.Cncf.Io <> wrote:
    Different projects make different design tradeoffs.

    Also, these 2 projects aren't directly comparable.

    This article explains the difference pretty well:

    On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 9:31 AM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
      CNCF allows for competing projects, see our TOC principles for more information on this:

      Istio currently isn't an official CNCF project but has been invited to formalize a project proposal.

      For the merits of one project over another, I'd advise you to speak to the respective project communities for that information.

      On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 11:10 AM, Santosa, Andy <asantosa@...> wrote:
      Hi Chris,
      Personally, I would like to get clarification of competing component: linkerd vs istio. I learnt for example one company I met in KubeCon converting from linkerd to istio.


      From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
      "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...>
      Wednesday, January 17, 2018 at 8:38 AM
      "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...>
      [cncf-toc] [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

      Hey TOC and community, we are requesting a vote to keep linkerd ( as an inception project for another year based on their presentation yesterday. Here are some stats shared yesterday from the linkerd community:

      * 60+ contributors; 50+ releases (2--4 week cadence); 3400+ GH stars
      * 1.5m+ Docker Hub pulls; 5--10 billion requests a day
      * 1400+ Slack members
      * 40+ companies using Linkerd in production. Public ones include Monzo, CreditKarma, Salesforce, Expedia, BigCommerce, NCBI, PayPal, Taboola, FOX, and AOL
      * Powers the Human Genome Project!

      Please vote +1/-1 (remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support).

      Also note that every inception project has to be reviewed on an annual basis to decide whether it will continue to be a CNCF project or potentially graduate to another level. We will have another discussion in the near future about moving/graduating linkerd to another level, along with other CNCF projects.


      Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

      Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

Duncan Johnston-Watt
Founder & Chair, Advisory Board
Phone: +44 777 190 2653 | Skype: duncan_johnstonwatt
Twitter: @duncanjw | LinkedIn:

Stay up to date with everything Cloudsoft:

Join { to automatically receive all group messages.