Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018
|
Doug Davis <dug@...>
+1 to keeping it - non-binding I think the biggest concern is that Buoyant continues to dominate development given that other companies are generally making small patches rather than becoming major contributors. Chart: https://linkerd.devstats.cncf.io/dashboard/db/companies-velocity?orgId=1 Please note that non-binding votes are encouraged. -- Dan Kohn <dan@...> Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation https://www.cncf.io +1-415-233-1000 https://www.dankohn.com On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 10:24 PM, Duncan Johnston-Watt <duncan.johnstonwatt@...> wrote:
Best Duncan On 17 January 2018 at 20:59, Brandon Dimcheff via Lists.Cncf.Io <brandon=olark.com@...> wrote: I don't have a vote, but I'd love to see linkerd remain a CNCF project. - brandon On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 2:20 PM William Morgan <william@...> wrote:
-William On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 10:06 AM, Brian Grant via Lists.Cncf.Io <briangrant=google.com@...> wrote: Different projects make different design tradeoffs. Also, these 2 projects aren't directly comparable. This article explains the difference pretty well: https://blog.envoyproxy.io/service-mesh-data-plane-vs-control-plane-2774e720f7fc On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 9:31 AM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/PRINCIPLES.md#no-kingmakers--one-size-does-not-fit-all Istio currently isn't an official CNCF project but has been invited to formalize a project proposal. For the merits of one project over another, I'd advise you to speak to the respective project communities for that information. On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 11:10 AM, Santosa, Andy <asantosa@...> wrote: Hi Chris, Personally, I would like to get clarification of competing component: linkerd vs istio. I learnt for example one company I met in KubeCon converting from linkerd to istio. Regards, -Andy From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> Reply-To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...> Date: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 at 8:38 AM To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...> Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018 Hey TOC and community, we are requesting a vote to keep linkerd (https://github.com/linkerd/linkerd) as an inception project for another year based on their presentation yesterday. Here are some stats shared yesterday from the linkerd community: * 60+ contributors; 50+ releases (2--4 week cadence); 3400+ GH stars * 1.5m+ Docker Hub pulls; 5--10 billion requests a day * 1400+ Slack members * 40+ companies using Linkerd in production. Public ones include Monzo, CreditKarma, Salesforce, Expedia, BigCommerce, NCBI, PayPal, Taboola, FOX, and AOL * Powers the Human Genome Project! Please vote +1/-1 (remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support). Also note that every inception project has to be reviewed on an annual basis to decide whether it will continue to be a CNCF project or potentially graduate to another level. We will have another discussion in the near future about moving/graduating linkerd to another level, along with other CNCF projects. Thanks! -- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
-- Duncan Johnston-Watt Founder & Chair, Advisory Board Phone: +44 777 190 2653 | Skype: duncan_johnstonwatt Twitter: @duncanjw | LinkedIn: https://linkedin.com/in/duncanjohnstonwatt Stay up to date with everything Cloudsoft: |
|
|
"Dan Kohn" ---01/17/2018 10:58:41 PM---I think the biggest concern is that Buoyant continues to dominate development given that other compa