toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Yes, this is simply "let's keep this project going" decision.
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 12:14 PM, alexis richardson <alexis@...>
"Why are we doing this in 2 steps? This is just a "yes, we want to
keep the project" decision?"
agreed, Chris, what's your thinking here?
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 6:13 PM, Brian Grant via Lists.Cncf.Io
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 8:38 AM, Chris Aniszczyk
> <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Hey TOC and community, we are requesting a vote to keep linkerd
>> (https://github.com/linkerd/linkerd) as an inception project for another
>> year based on their presentation yesterday. Here are some stats shared
>> yesterday from the linkerd community:
>> * 60+ contributors; 50+ releases (2--4 week cadence); 3400+ GH stars
> In general, I'd like to link to devstats dashboards in these types of
> reviews, so we can see the trajectory. For example:
>> * 1.5m+ Docker Hub pulls; 5--10 billion requests a day
>> * 1400+ Slack members
>> * 40+ companies using Linkerd in production. Public ones include Monzo,
>> CreditKarma, Salesforce, Expedia, BigCommerce, NCBI, PayPal, Taboola, FOX,
>> and AOL
>> * Powers the Human Genome Project!
>> Please vote +1/-1 (remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do
>> appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support).
>> Also note that every inception project has to be reviewed on an annual
>> basis to decide whether it will continue to be a CNCF project or potentially
>> graduate to another level. We will have another discussion in the near
>> future about moving/graduating linkerd to another level, along with other
>> CNCF projects.
> Why are we doing this in 2 steps? This is just a "yes, we want to keep the
> project" decision?
>> Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719