Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

alexis richardson

"Why are we doing this in 2 steps? This is just a "yes, we want to
keep the project" decision?"

agreed, Chris, what's your thinking here?

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 6:13 PM, Brian Grant via Lists.Cncf.Io
<> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 8:38 AM, Chris Aniszczyk
<caniszczyk@...> wrote:

Hey TOC and community, we are requesting a vote to keep linkerd
( as an inception project for another
year based on their presentation yesterday. Here are some stats shared
yesterday from the linkerd community:

* 60+ contributors; 50+ releases (2--4 week cadence); 3400+ GH stars

In general, I'd like to link to devstats dashboards in these types of
reviews, so we can see the trajectory. For example:

* 1.5m+ Docker Hub pulls; 5--10 billion requests a day
* 1400+ Slack members
* 40+ companies using Linkerd in production. Public ones include Monzo,
CreditKarma, Salesforce, Expedia, BigCommerce, NCBI, PayPal, Taboola, FOX,
and AOL
* Powers the Human Genome Project!

Please vote +1/-1 (remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do
appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support).

Also note that every inception project has to be reviewed on an annual
basis to decide whether it will continue to be a CNCF project or potentially
graduate to another level. We will have another discussion in the near
future about moving/graduating linkerd to another level, along with other
CNCF projects.

Why are we doing this in 2 steps? This is just a "yes, we want to keep the
project" decision?


Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

Join to automatically receive all group messages.