Re: Infrakit Questions
|
Rob Hirschfeld
Responding to request from TOC meeting last week... I think that Day 1 and Day 2 provisioning is key area for CNCF to cover; however, I think that the space is transforming in several different ways so I would suggest more review by the TOC. Obviously, I have an interest in this since I'm a lead on Digital Rebar. For that reason, I'm reluctant to push against or pull for related projects. For LinuxKit specifically, I think the emphasis on immutable operating systems should be considered carefully. There are many benefits to this approach but they cannot be applied generally to legacy workloads and management tooling. I believe that operational adoption is accelerated when tooling fits well with both new and existing ops models. Again - I'm happy to show how we solve this problem with Digital Rebar at a TOC. It's not just about physical provisioning - managing server life-cycle in multiple infastructures is a key design requirement. Tooling that does not address the full life-cycle may actually make management harder over time. Rob ____________________________ Rob Hirschfeld, 512-773-7522 RackN CEO/Founder (rob@...) I am in CENTRAL (-6) time http://robhirschfeld.com twitter: @zehicle, github: zehicle
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Alex Baretto <axbaretto@...> wrote:
|
|
|
