|
Accepted: [cncf-sig-observability] Invitation: CNCF SIG-Observability Meeting @ Tue Mar 9, 2021 9am - 9:50am (PST) (cncf-sig-observability@lists.cncf.io)
By
tomasrebelomota@...
·
#50
·
|
|
Invitation: CNCF SIG-Observability Meeting @ Tue Mar 9, 2021 9am - 9:50am (PST) (cncf-sig-observability@lists.cncf.io)
You have been invited to the following event.
CNCF SIG-Observability Meeting
When
Tue Mar 9, 2021 9am – 9:50am Pacific Time - Los
You have been invited to the following event.
CNCF SIG-Observability Meeting
When
Tue Mar 9, 2021 9am – 9:50am Pacific Time - Los
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#49
·
|
|
Re: OpenTelemetry incubation due diligence
Hi All,
Thanks, Steve for addressing our comments so far! As the SIG Observability Tech Lead, I felt responsible to spend more time on a deeper exploration of OpenTelemetry, as I was new to this. I
Hi All,
Thanks, Steve for addressing our comments so far! As the SIG Observability Tech Lead, I felt responsible to spend more time on a deeper exploration of OpenTelemetry, as I was new to this. I
|
By
Bartłomiej Płotka
·
#48
·
|
|
OpenTelemetry incubation due diligence
Hey everyone,
Thanks for the time and feedback today during the OpenTelemetry incubation due diligence review today. As promised, I have addressed the initial feedback. I would encourage everyone to
Hey everyone,
Thanks for the time and feedback today during the OpenTelemetry incubation due diligence review today. As promised, I have addressed the initial feedback. I would encourage everyone to
|
By
Steve Flanders
·
#47
·
|
|
PromQL compliance overview
Dear all,
https://promlabs.com/blog/2020/11/26/an-update-on-promql-compatibility-across-vendors
might be of wider interest within this group.
Best,
Richard
Dear all,
https://promlabs.com/blog/2020/11/26/an-update-on-promql-compatibility-across-vendors
might be of wider interest within this group.
Best,
Richard
|
By
Richard Hartmann
·
#46
·
|
|
Re: Due diligence document for OpenMetrics
Dear all,
as agreed during the last SIG O11y call, we addressed all comments &
concerns in the document, both the ones raised during the call and
afterwards. Please review/clarify/update where
Dear all,
as agreed during the last SIG O11y call, we addressed all comments &
concerns in the document, both the ones raised during the call and
afterwards. Please review/clarify/update where
|
By
Richard Hartmann
·
#45
·
|
|
Due diligence document for OpenMetrics
Dear all,
for today's SIG O11y DD on OM (abbrevations!), please see
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BN6ABvfbAMhJthH6xNOY5Lmls3jeE3kFbMgF04BzEKE
Ideally read it before the meeting.
For the
Dear all,
for today's SIG O11y DD on OM (abbrevations!), please see
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BN6ABvfbAMhJthH6xNOY5Lmls3jeE3kFbMgF04BzEKE
Ideally read it before the meeting.
For the
|
By
Richard Hartmann
·
#44
·
|
|
Tomorrow's SIG Observability Sync: Call for agenda items and Time alignment.
Hi,
Hope you are all well!
1. To avoid timing confusion, let's agree on one time finally (: There were some wintertime clock changes in EU, all went upside down. I assumed we align to the public CNCF
Hi,
Hope you are all well!
1. To avoid timing confusion, let's agree on one time finally (: There were some wintertime clock changes in EU, all went upside down. I assumed we align to the public CNCF
|
By
Bartłomiej Płotka
·
#43
·
|
|
Subscribe
By
St Leger, Jim
·
#42
·
|
|
Re: Hello after Summer: We are back with the SIG Observability Meetings!
Ooh, thanks for that. I just joined and am catching up. Very observable 🤭
Ooh, thanks for that. I just joined and am catching up. Very observable 🤭
|
By
Ryan Ordway
·
#41
·
|
|
Re: Hello after Summer: We are back with the SIG Observability Meetings!
> Factual correction:
😱
Kind Regards,
Bartek Płotka (@bwplotka)
> Factual correction:
😱
Kind Regards,
Bartek Płotka (@bwplotka)
|
By
Bartłomiej Płotka
·
#40
·
|
|
Re: Hello after Summer: We are back with the SIG Observability Meetings!
Yeah, great. Thanks.--
This is my life,but world of us~~
Yeah, great. Thanks.--
This is my life,but world of us~~
|
By
Michael Wang <xdragon007@...>
·
#39
·
|
|
Re: Hello after Summer: We are back with the SIG Observability Meetings!
Factual correction:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLj6h78yzYM2PJkFrpP6IT52KkdBvcvS_9
We should _resume_ recording ;)
Cheers,
Michael
--
Product Developer Advocate, AWS container
Factual correction:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLj6h78yzYM2PJkFrpP6IT52KkdBvcvS_9
We should _resume_ recording ;)
Cheers,
Michael
--
Product Developer Advocate, AWS container
|
By
Hausenblas, Michael
·
#38
·
|
|
Re: Hello after Summer: We are back with the SIG Observability Meetings!
We can consider recording those, yes (:
So far we did not.
Kind Regards,
Bartek Płotka (@bwplotka)
We can consider recording those, yes (:
So far we did not.
Kind Regards,
Bartek Płotka (@bwplotka)
|
By
Bartłomiej Płotka
·
#37
·
|
|
Re: Hello after Summer: We are back with the SIG Observability Meetings!
Hi
Do we have recordings for the meeting?
It is too late for me to join.
--
This is my life,but world of us~~
Hi
Do we have recordings for the meeting?
It is too late for me to join.
--
This is my life,but world of us~~
|
By
Michael Wang <xdragon007@...>
·
#36
·
|
|
Hello after Summer: We are back with the SIG Observability Meetings!
Hi SIG Observability!
Hope at least some of us had some relaxing time this summer - I am personally still looking for some PTO time 🌴🌴🌴 (:
Just a short reminder: We are back with the SIG
Hi SIG Observability!
Hope at least some of us had some relaxing time this summer - I am personally still looking for some PTO time 🌴🌴🌴 (:
Just a short reminder: We are back with the SIG
|
By
Bartłomiej Płotka
·
#35
·
|
|
Re: Prometheus & Observability documentation
Thanks for this feedback!
<arthursens2005@...> wrote:
I agree that ML needs more nuance. I have better mental pictures to
transport my caveats now and those would hopefully enable
Thanks for this feedback!
<arthursens2005@...> wrote:
I agree that ML needs more nuance. I have better mental pictures to
transport my caveats now and those would hopefully enable
|
By
RichiH Hartmann
·
#34
·
|
|
Re: Prometheus & Observability documentation
Thanks Arthur - those questions are an amazing indication for us what sections of our potential SIG 101 doc should be extended (:
> One topic that is still unclear to me is: When should I need
Thanks Arthur - those questions are an amazing indication for us what sections of our potential SIG 101 doc should be extended (:
> One topic that is still unclear to me is: When should I need
|
By
Bartłomiej Płotka
·
#33
·
|
|
Re: Prometheus & Observability documentation
Hello Richard and everyone,
Maybe some of you recognize me from GitHub, some may not, but for context to everyone.. I'm a recently graduated student with not much experience around the whole
Hello Richard and everyone,
Maybe some of you recognize me from GitHub, some may not, but for context to everyone.. I'm a recently graduated student with not much experience around the whole
|
By
Arthur Silva Sens
·
#32
·
|
|
Re: Prometheus & Observability documentation
Post it here, please. I do get FOSDEM feedback email too, but that's
invisible to this list.
Post it here, please. I do get FOSDEM feedback email too, but that's
invisible to this list.
|
By
Richard Hartmann
·
#31
·
|