Thanks for this feedback! <arthursens2005@...> wrote: I agree that ML needs more nuance. I have better mental pictures to transport my caveats now and those would hopefully enable

Thanks Arthur - those questions are an amazing indication for us what sections of our potential SIG 101 doc should be extended (: > One topic that is still unclear to me is: When should I need

Hello Richard and everyone, Maybe some of you recognize me from GitHub, some may not, but for context to everyone.. I'm a recently graduated student with not much experience around the whole

Post it here, please. I do get FOSDEM feedback email too, but that's invisible to this list.

Hi Richard, Regarding Observability 101 content: I noticed the recording page has a feedback link. Should I send feedback there, or post it here? Thank you, Amin

Dear all, as we were only nine people during the call, as PTO time is coming, and as we don't have any pressing action items, we decided to skip both August meetings. Best, Richard

Dear all, during our call I mentioned that Prometheus will be overhauling our complete documentation, see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yuaPKLDvhJNXMF1ubsOOm5kE2_6dvCxHowBQIDs0KdU/edit for

Dear all, as per yesterday's call, we will start collecting use cases for data analysis scenarios. Please use https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yfbBG8MBllLRCXVNMp2fgRJm5TiCooO9NSD2CfOQ4ck/edit as

Dear all, as agreed during the last meeting, we will start future calls s.t., i.e. on time. While I understand the struggle of juggling endless meetings all too well, we end at 50m to allow people to

Hi. A short reminder to check the DD before tomorrow's meeting as the plan is to review it together, similar to the Cortex document. Doc:

> Thanks for those examples, a recommendation of using those would be amazing as well. What I will say might be controversial, but the goal of this initiative is NOT to steal projects or compete with

BTW, Looks like Dan also suggests Analytics is in scope of our SIGs currently: https://github.com/cncf/landscape/issues/1632#issuecomment-638763810 (: Kind Regards, Bartek

The IETF, the RIPE, and the Prometheus, model is to make something that works first, and then start branching out from there. So yes, I would strongly argue it should live somewhere related first, and

Hey Richi, With respect to using R with Prometheus data, both Spark and Presto have the ability to write R programs against. Spark is much more mature in this space however. SparkR can run R functions

Hijacking top email to reply across the board. As many of you will know, I have been nagging Prometheus-team about this for years, so yes, I think we should cover this. At PromCon 2017's dev summit

Hello, I’m Povilas Versockas one of the Thanos maintainers & Prometheus Community organizers. Similar to the Cortex document as per the next SIG Observability task I have prepared a Thanos Due

Ricardo, Rob thanks for the answers so far! (: Ricardo: > This is a great idea. Keep in mind that OLAPs are not necessarily used for monitoring and observability. Yup, we have already solid projects

Hey Bartek, Glad to hear this topic brought up, it's something we think a lot about and have some experience with it at Uber (running OLAP queries against monitoring and observability data). 1. With

Bartek, This is a great idea. Keep in mind that OLAPs are not necessarily used for monitoring and observability. For example, in the past, I worked on implementing Apache Druid to collect mobile

Hi SIG Observability! 👋 I recently noticed that many of CNCF's Prometheus and Thanos users often desire to use their metric data collected by Prometheus for more advanced Analytics cases. Something