Date
1 - 5 of 5
Last Call: Request4Comments-Contributor Templates / Heads up TOC Liaisons
|
Paris Pittman <paris_pittman@...>
All -
A few templates and guidance are ready for a last call review from the group; we’ll give it until Friday, Jan 8th 6pm GMT. Saad and Matt, please weigh in with your final comments and take to TOC after this period. We’ve discussed a template/guidance graduation process for go forward that will find a home in our charter soon (TODO). We can "graduate” each doc to the cncf/project-template repo for folks to start using post approval process. Summarized: - folks collaborate on the draft guidance/template - draft enters review phase with community via a PR to the appropriate place - matt and saad weigh in with final comments - toc review - file is live in the cncf/project-template repo with an approved by TOC date Graduation Reviews: (last call) reviews go here: https://github.com/cncf/sig-contributor-strategy/issues/68 - GOVERNANCE-subprojects.md ——— (in another repo but will move to template folder after approval) —— Items not up for graduation but need more community review, comments, and/or collaboration: https://github.com/cncf/sig-contributor-strategy/issues -> highlights include taxonomies?, graduation requirements, contributor website features, maintainers circle, and more https://github.com/cncf/sig-contributor-strategy/pulls-> includes website work and draft start of recruiting contributors guidance Thanks to Karen, Carolyn, Dawn, Josh, and many others for your contributions to this guidance and the community. Questions? Reply here or #sig-contributor-strategy in CNCF slack. Paris Pittman Apple OSPO One Apple Park Way Cupertino, CA 95014, USA iPhone +1-410-440-8754
|
|
|
|
Paris Pittman <paris_pittman@...>
Updates:
Matt/Saad - please review the rest and let us know your thoughts. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Saad Ali <saadali@...>
Apologies for the delay, Paris. What's the best way to review and provide comments?
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 10:20 AM Paris Pittman <paris_pittman@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Josh Berkus
On 1/20/21 11:22 PM, Saad Ali via lists.cncf.io wrote:
Apologies for the delay, Paris. What's the best way to review and Ooops! Missed this question. GOVERNANCE-subprojects: comment on the Pull Request, here: https://github.com/cncf/project-template/pull/7 This is ready for your review and approval. contributor-ladder: we have an HackMD in progress, here: https://hackmd.io/KBwWdIP3QEOhW68YKcP0NA?edit This is not ready for approval yet, Karen and I are in the process of doing an overhaul. While you're at it, we also have a new document in early drafts on on hackmd. You don't need to review/approve it yet, but I figured you might be interested: https://hackmd.io/QoqoYrV2RFC6ckCL68DmVg -- -- Josh Berkus Kubernetes Community Red Hat OSPO
|
|
|
|
Paris Pittman <paris_pittman@...>
For anything that has already merged (before we thought about graduation requirements; we can iterate on your+TOC suggested changes) using this umbrella issue https://github.com/cncf/sig-contributor-strategy/issues/68 Repo where much of this is going:
|
|
|