Hello everyone, I want to provide an update on our last call in a fast and easy-to-read way. Operator Definition We are getting back to the document again Working on overall clean-up of the document D

Hello! In yesterday's SIG Meeting we discussed about how to proceed with the Operator WG and found out that it would be useful to find out what the goal of the document is, but also to clean up the wo

VOTE: https://doodle.com/poll/7iek4zbgqm9zr388 Our current meeting time is on Friday's during an non-ideal time. We've seen a large reduction in attendance as we've moved into summer. So we've decided

Hi, In the last WG meeting (27.5), we were only three people, and we felt that this is not enough people for a vote. Instead, we want to try to use the mailing list to get more opinions, and maybe als

Hey there SIG-App-Delivery, I would love to get on the upcoming agenda/schedule to present a sandbox proposal for the Crossplane project. A PR to the TOC repo that has all the details should be opened

Hello everyone, In today’s call we discussed how to move the “app delivery landscape” forward. We have the great initial document [1] Harry wrote quite a while back. Discussing the doc we agreed that

There are some parts of the operator definition working doc I was hoping to discuss between meetings. Some things are not clear. The document starts with a goal and a concept but not a definition. If

In the Air Gapped WG, during the previous meeting, there was discussion on using Helm v2 in an air gapped environment. Helm v3 works with no extra config but Helm v2 has some hoops. In that meeting I

Hi App Delivery SIG members and community, The Cloud Native Buildpacks (CNB) project has requested to move to the incubation level: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/338 We've drafted the Due Diligence

I know the operator wg has been working on a definition. For my own thought process I wrote down my thinking in a doc. You can find that doc at https://docs.google.com/document/d/13qHfdHwniZBaLpDClcGa

You have been invited to the following event. SIG App-Delivery Air Gapped Working Group When Wed Mar 25, 2020 9am – 9:50am Pacific Time - Los Angeles Where https://zoom.us/my/cncfsigappdelivery (map)

Hello everybody, As discussed a while back we are also planning a working group on Operators. This is the next step after starting the work on operator definition. During the creation of the document

You have been invited to the following event. Air Gapped Working Group When Every 2 weeks from 12pm to 1pm on Friday Central Time - Chicago Where TBD (map) Calendar cncf-sig-app-delivery@... Who • rya

Hello All! Our first action for the Airgap Working Group is to find a Time and Cadence that works for those interested. Please fill out the two doodles below so we can find a common time that works fo

You have been invited to the following event. CNCF App Delivery Meeting When Monthly from 8am to 9am on the first Wednesday Pacific Time - Los Angeles Where https://zoom.us/my/cncfsigappdelivery, (map

I got pulled into something at work yesterday and missed the airgap kickoff.. was there a recording or at least some meeting notes taken? Thanks, Ken

You have been invited to the following event. Air-gapped Working Group Kickoff When Tue Feb 25, 2020 11am – 11:45am Eastern Time - New York Where https://zoom.us/my/cncfsigappdelivery (map) Calendar c

Hello, We are kicking off the inaugural meeting of the Air-gapped working group. In this meeting we’ll kick off the charter and start collecting outputs to be generated. A meeting invite will be sent

Thanks for the presentation, I had a few questions and thought I'd kick things off here. 1. Compatibility Terminology wise, checking this is still the canonical definition from a concept point of view

SIG Members, We started to work on best practices for air-gapped environments as there was a lot of interest during the last KubeCon. Jeremy already present work on CNAB and air-gapped deployments. In