cncf-tag-app-delivery@lists.cncf.io

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

Hi, In the last WG meeting (27.5), we were only three people, and we felt that this is not enough people for a vote. Instead, we want to try to use the mailing list to get more opinions, and maybe

By Omer Kahani · #200 ·

Sandbox presentation to SIG for Crossplane

Hey there SIG-App-Delivery, I would love to get on the upcoming agenda/schedule to present a sandbox proposal for the Crossplane project. A PR to the TOC repo that has all the details should be opened

By Jared Watts · #199 ·

Collecting questions around app delivery

Hello everyone, In today’s call we discussed how to move the “app delivery landscape” forward. We have the great initial document [1] Harry wrote quite a while back. Discussing the doc

By Reitbauer, Alois · #198 ·

Re: Operator WG: Getting To A Definition

About 2, I think that there would be components that we know called controllers that would have to change there name to an operator. The deployment controller is a good example: - It extends the

By Omer Kahani · #197 ·

Re: Operator WG: Getting To A Definition

The ask from the TOC was about the sort of operators that the operator framework and KUDO enable. The essence of the pattern described by Brandon Philips. You are absolutely right that this has to do

By Matt Farina · #196 ·

Re: Operator WG: Getting To A Definition

Operator definitions seem to vary based on audience and context. Here are some equally valid (in my opinion) definitions of operators, but they address different audiences for different purposes: 1.

By Evan Cordell · #195 ·

Re: Operator WG: Getting To A Definition

Do we have a list of things that call themself operator? I agree we don't need to stretch the definition to include all of them, but it will be a good starting point. From a list, we could find common

By Omer Kahani · #194 ·

Operator WG: Getting To A Definition

There are some parts of the operator definition working doc I was hoping to discuss between meetings. Some things are not clear. The document starts with a goal and a concept but not a definition. If

By Matt Farina · #193 ·

Air Gapped Helm

In the Air Gapped WG, during the previous meeting, there was discussion on using Helm v2 in an air gapped environment. Helm v3 works with no extra config but Helm v2 has some hoops. In that meeting I

By Matt Farina · #192 ·

[Due Diligence] Cloud Native Buildpacks

Hi App Delivery SIG members and community, The Cloud Native Buildpacks (CNB) project has requested to move to the incubation level: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/338 We've drafted the Due Diligence

By Terence Lee · #191 ·

What is a Kubernetes Operator doc

I know the operator wg has been working on a definition. For my own thought process I wrote down my thinking in a doc. You can find that doc at

By Matt Farina · #190 ·

Invitation: SIG App-Delivery Air Gapped Working Group @ Wed Mar 25, 2020 9am - 9:50am (PDT) (cncf-sig-app-delivery@lists.cncf.io)

You have been invited to the following event. SIG App-Delivery Air Gapped Working Group When Wed Mar 25, 2020 9am – 9:50am Pacific Time - Los Angeles Where https://zoom.us/my/cncfsigappdelivery

By Amye Scavarda Perrin · #189 ·

Re: Starting work on Operator Working Group

Thanks Alois, let us know if there is anything we can help with. Chris Hein On Mar 13, 2020, 11:28 AM -0700, Reitbauer, Alois <alois.reitbauer@...>, wrote:

By Chris Hein · #188 ·

Re: Starting work on Operator Working Group

I am working on getting a meeting on the calendar next week. From: <cncf-sig-app-delivery@...> on behalf of "mhamdi.semah via Lists.Cncf.Io" <mhamdi.semah=gmail.com@...> Reply to:

By Reitbauer, Alois · #187 ·

Re: Starting work on Operator Working Group

I'd like to contribute. Looking forward to it.

By mhamdi.semah@... · #186 ·

Invitation: Air Gapped Working Group @ Every 2 weeks from 12pm to 1pm on Friday (CDT) (cncf-sig-app-delivery@lists.cncf.io)

You have been invited to the following event. Air Gapped Working Group When Every 2 weeks from 12pm to 1pm on Friday Central Time - Chicago Where TBD

By ryan.j.bezdicek@... · #185 ·

Re: Starting work on Operator Working Group

I am interested in participating in this SIG. I work on Knative and have spent a fair amount of time thinking about controllers and how to write them. I think the thing that no one has really talked

By Scott Nichols · #184 ·

Re: Starting work on Operator Working Group

I'd definitely be interested in being involved :) I'm especially keen to understand how we can: * Define best practices around _deploying_ operators, including periphery components such as webhooks *

By james@... · #183 ·

Re: Starting work on Operator Working Group

Alois, Are we ready to move to the next steps? The charter seems to be settling. I'd move to kick off an initial meeting, establish leadership, and establish the scope and times for this WG and begin

By Gerred Dillon · #182 ·

Re: Starting work on Operator Working Group

Great initiative, I'm very interested in participating.

By Felipe Musse · #181 ·

121 - 140 of 319

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms