|
Re: Artifacts WG Initial Meeting Tomorrow
Hi folks - following the meeting planned above and another one last week we've reached consensus on the charter, initial work, and tentative problem statements for the new WG. Please take a look and
Hi folks - following the meeting planned above and another one last week we've reached consensus on the charter, initial work, and tentative problem statements for the new WG. Please take a look and
|
By
Josh Gavant
·
#321
·
|
|
Artifacts WG Initial Meeting Tomorrow
Hello app deliverers! The TAG will host a preliminary meeting of the proposed Artifacts WG tomorrow Friday May 19 to finish the group's charter and start work towards its goals. More info on the
Hello app deliverers! The TAG will host a preliminary meeting of the proposed Artifacts WG tomorrow Friday May 19 to finish the group's charter and start work towards its goals. More info on the
|
By
Josh Gavant
·
#320
·
|
|
[Microcks Sandbox application] Thanks, slides of KubeCon intro and live demo to follow-up
Hi All,
Just wanted to thank all the TAG leads for inviting me to do a lightning talk on Tuesday 18th during Kubecon. Thanks for the warm welcome and all the feedback I have been to grab during the
Hi All,
Just wanted to thank all the TAG leads for inviting me to do a lightning talk on Tuesday 18th during Kubecon. Thanks for the warm welcome and all the feedback I have been to grab during the
|
By
Yacine Kheddache
·
#319
·
|
|
[gitops-wg] New Maintainer nomination
Hello everyone,
for transparency, a new maintainer has been nominated in the OpenGitOps Working Group. Niki Manoledaki is already leading the GitOps Environmental Sustainability subgroup's efforts in
Hello everyone,
for transparency, a new maintainer has been nominated in the OpenGitOps Working Group. Niki Manoledaki is already leading the GitOps Environmental Sustainability subgroup's efforts in
|
By
Niklas
·
#318
·
|
|
[Artifacts] Requesting new Artifacts Working Group
Hi, everyone!
We are requesting a new Artifacts WG under TAG App Delivery.
Please add your thoughts to this GitHub issue: cncf/tag-app-delivery#368.
Thanks, and looking forward to working with you
Hi, everyone!
We are requesting a new Artifacts WG under TAG App Delivery.
Please add your thoughts to this GitHub issue: cncf/tag-app-delivery#368.
Thanks, and looking forward to working with you
|
By
Scott Rigby
·
#317
·
|
|
Application Definitions Follow Up
Hello Everyone!
In the last TAG Meeting, we discussed the need for Application Definitions and some topics around this. We created a document where we want to collect ideas to proceed with this (and
Hello Everyone!
In the last TAG Meeting, we discussed the need for Application Definitions and some topics around this. We created a document where we want to collect ideas to proceed with this (and
|
By
Thomas Schuetz
·
#316
·
|
|
[Platforms] "Platforms for cloud-native computing" final content ready
Hi TAG members. As discussed in #310 and thanks to many great contributors, WG Platforms has wrapped up content development for our whitepaper defining Platforms for cloud-native computing and we're
Hi TAG members. As discussed in #310 and thanks to many great contributors, WG Platforms has wrapped up content development for our whitepaper defining Platforms for cloud-native computing and we're
|
By
Josh Gavant
·
#315
·
|
|
Re: Platforms definition whitepaper ready for review
Hey all, this far I've been an observer and I'm looking forward to participating in meetings going forward.
Just want to confirm the date for Tue the 17th, as I had 2nd and 4th Tuesdays in my
Hey all, this far I've been an observer and I'm looking forward to participating in meetings going forward.
Just want to confirm the date for Tue the 17th, as I had 2nd and 4th Tuesdays in my
|
By
mayreply@...
·
#314
·
|
|
Re: Platforms definition whitepaper ready for review
Hi Aaron,
Thanks for the question. This is an extra "working" meeting specifically to focus on the whitepaper *content*. The regularly scheduled meeting couldn't go that deep on hot topics and seeking
Hi Aaron,
Thanks for the question. This is an extra "working" meeting specifically to focus on the whitepaper *content*. The regularly scheduled meeting couldn't go that deep on hot topics and seeking
|
By
Josh Gavant
·
#313
·
|
|
Re: Platforms definition whitepaper ready for review
Hi folks - we'll be reviewing hot topics related to the whitepaper's content and seeking owners for section reviews in a meeting this Tuesday Jan. 17 @ 1600 UTC.
Here's the meeting event page to add
Hi folks - we'll be reviewing hot topics related to the whitepaper's content and seeking owners for section reviews in a meeting this Tuesday Jan. 17 @ 1600 UTC.
Here's the meeting event page to add
|
By
Josh Gavant
·
#312
·
|
|
Re: Platforms definition whitepaper ready for review
this is actually a really nice validation of the initial assumptions of CNCF, that an industry platform could emerge from collections of loosely coupled cloud native tools.
this is actually a really nice validation of the initial assumptions of CNCF, that an industry platform could emerge from collections of loosely coupled cloud native tools.
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#311
·
|
|
Platforms definition whitepaper ready for review
Hi TAG and happy new year! WG Platforms finished 2022 by building the whitepaper described in https://github.com/cncf/tag-app-delivery/issues/246 to define what a cloud-native platform is, why it's
Hi TAG and happy new year! WG Platforms finished 2022 by building the whitepaper described in https://github.com/cncf/tag-app-delivery/issues/246 to define what a cloud-native platform is, why it's
|
By
Josh Gavant
·
#310
·
|
|
[gitops-wg] 📢 GitOpsCon relocates to Open Source Summit
Hi everyone!
You may have heard the news: GitOpsCon is joining forces with CdCon and moving from KubeCon + CloudNativeCon to Open Source Summit starting in 2023!
Check out this blog post which
Hi everyone!
You may have heard the news: GitOpsCon is joining forces with CdCon and moving from KubeCon + CloudNativeCon to Open Source Summit starting in 2023!
Check out this blog post which
|
By
Scott Rigby
·
#309
·
|
|
Re: [gitops-wg] GitOps & Environmental Sustainability Subgroup meeting
Thanks Niklas, Niki, and everyone involved in this subgroup 🌎
--
Scott Rigby
Developer Experience, Weaveworks
Thanks Niklas, Niki, and everyone involved in this subgroup 🌎
--
Scott Rigby
Developer Experience, Weaveworks
|
By
Scott Rigby
·
#308
·
|
|
[gitops-wg] GitOps & Environmental Sustainability Subgroup meeting
Hey everyone,
for the first GitOps & Environmental Sustainability Subgroup 🌱 meeting Niki created an issue in the project's repository. We want to meet Tuesday 15th November at 6pm CET/12pm ET/9am
Hey everyone,
for the first GitOps & Environmental Sustainability Subgroup 🌱 meeting Niki created an issue in the project's repository. We want to meet Tuesday 15th November at 6pm CET/12pm ET/9am
|
By
Niklas
·
#307
·
|
|
[gitops-wg] Maintainer and Governance updates
Hello everyone!
Please see this PR which updates OpenGitOps governance to Move top level power to maintainers #123.
While there are overlapping members, once that PR is merged, the OpenGitOps project
Hello everyone!
Please see this PR which updates OpenGitOps governance to Move top level power to maintainers #123.
While there are overlapping members, once that PR is merged, the OpenGitOps project
|
By
Scott Rigby
·
#306
·
|
|
Today's TAG App Delivery meeting
Who is planning to join the meeting today? If you have a agenda item, feel to add it for today.
// AloisThis email may contain confidential information. If it appears this message was sent to you
Who is planning to join the meeting today? If you have a agenda item, feel to add it for today.
// AloisThis email may contain confidential information. If it appears this message was sent to you
|
By
Reitbauer, Alois
·
#305
·
|
|
New Maintainers OpenGitOps Working Group
For transparency, New Maintainers have been nominated for the OpenGitOps Working Group
https://github.com/open-gitops/project/pull/107
Christian Hernandez
(626) 502-8310
Developer Experience and
For transparency, New Maintainers have been nominated for the OpenGitOps Working Group
https://github.com/open-gitops/project/pull/107
Christian Hernandez
(626) 502-8310
Developer Experience and
|
By
Christian Hernandez
·
#304
·
|
|
Re: [gitops-wg] Improving GitOps usability
BTW, on GUIs being necessary:
A GUI isn't strictly necessary, but this makes it Possible. It also makes other types of automation possible.
It eliminates the requirement of manual editing of
BTW, on GUIs being necessary:
A GUI isn't strictly necessary, but this makes it Possible. It also makes other types of automation possible.
It eliminates the requirement of manual editing of
|
By
Brian Grant
·
#303
·
|
|
Re: [gitops-wg] Improving GitOps usability
Will watch video for sure.
To be clear, you don't have to use git, any object store that's versioned will do. If git is in the way, use something that works and is versioned.
Also, I think it was Dan
Will watch video for sure.
To be clear, you don't have to use git, any object store that's versioned will do. If git is in the way, use something that works and is versioned.
Also, I think it was Dan
|
By
Chris Short <cbshort@...>
·
#302
·
|