CKA Beta update
We wanted to address some of the concerns/questions that have been posted over the past few days (apologies in advance for what is a pretty long email). Before diving in, we would like to note that we (CNCF & LF) want the initial class KCSPs to be substantial so please rest assured that we'll be flexible in working with your organization to ensure you qualify if at all possible, including additional attempts at no cost if necessary.
I'd also like to again remind folks to please use certificationsupport@...
if you have questions about your individual exam status. We know
it's taken longer to respond in some cases than we'd like but
(unlike the support address) there's no ticket management system
on this mailing list so the risk of your inquiry being lost in the
shuffle is high.
Now, onto some of the issues raised:
I'm sure not every concern is reflected above but this represents
a summary of the most consistent themes that we've heard across
the various channels of input.
-- Clyde Seepersad General Manager, Training & Certification e: cseepersad@... p: 404 964 6973
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I also would like to suggest that the passing score should be decreased to a very fair score as there were several issues (clusters down, nodes down, clarity of questions, hard questions at the end, etc) for myself and many candidates in the exam. Also I am sure that all the candidates who sat for the beta exam is very competent in kubernetes and might have lost confidence in the exam due to the above issues and scored lesser in the exam than their potential.. Just a thought from myself Clyde. Thank you , awaiting your updates..
Thanks and regards
Mario Ishara Fernando
Pearson Lanka (pvt) Ltd
On 2 Sep 2017 1:03 am, "Clyde Seepersad" <cseepersad@...> wrote: