On Dec 10 the CloudEvents project approved v1.0.1 of its specifications. Congratulations and thanks to everyone involved in this latest update. For the most part this is just clarifications to the v1.

Sorry for the delay, but I just created the PR for v1.0.1 of the CloudEvents specs: https://github.com/cloudevents/spec/pull/744 Please look it over for any errors. Key things to note: - the "specvers

All, On today's CloudEvents call we decided that it would be good if we released a v1.0.1 version of the CloudEvents specs before the end of the year. It's been a little over a year since we released

All, on today's call we decided that it might be confusing to people to come to our repo and not be presented with the very latest released version of our specs. Instead, they're shown a work-in-progr

All, PR 713 [1] was opened to address some confusion in the CloudEvents spec. In the definition of optional attributes (such as "subject" [2]), there's this text under the "Constraints" section: If pr

All - just a reminder that we have a Discovery Interop call today at 9amPT/12pmET - normal zoom channel. I won't be able to make it tho... sorry Scenario doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ptWy5

All - there will be a CloudEvent interop demo meeting on Monday (Nov 2nd) at 12pm ET - same zoom channel as normal. If you plan on participating in the interop please try to attend so we can continue

Just a reminder, our weekly call will be one hour earlier for the EU folks this week - if my math is right - since they had their time change this past weekend. Next week we should be back to the old

I have a conflict today and cannot attend today's CE meeting.

All, Just as a reminder, on the CloudEvents website ( https://cloudevents.io/ ) we have a list of "integrations", or folks using CloudEvents. If you would like your org mentioned in that list please f

All, The CNCF is doing their 2020 community survey, and would love to hear your feedback: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/WZLF3TB Please consider participating if you get a chance. They will share the

I’ve read with excitement that the proposal to jointly start working on a schema registry API has been accepted by the group last week: https://github.com/cloudevents/spec/issues/610 I’ve been asking

All, In case you missed this week's CloudEvents/Serverless WG call, there are a few things to note: - the bi-weekly SDK call is now weekly due to the increased activity and needs for (virtual) f2f dis

All, just a few reminders in prep for this week's call: Clemens has this proposal: Proposal to form a sub-working group for a schema registry API [1] - Unless there are lot of discussion on the call,

All, the SDK call took up the full hour on Thursday so we didn't get a chance to talk about the KubeCon EU event. We rescheduled it from 10am-10:30am ET on Monday if anyone is interested in joining. t

All, sorry for the delay in sending this note, but I wanted to remind people of a few work items in prep for this week's call: - Please review the "HTTP Multipart content mode" PR: https://github.com/

All as mentioned on this week's call, we've been working on the proposed charter for SIG-Serverless. See what you think: https://gist.github.com/duglin/7973b153b4613c11fe2ad071ef2b1780 thanks -Doug __

Just a reminder of a few things in prep for this week's CloudEvents call We're hoping to approve - https://github.com/cloudevents/spec/pull/580 - https://github.com/cloudevents/spec/pull/590 as the fi

All, as I mentioned in Slack, our two main presenters are out this week so instead of having a quick call it seems best to just cancel it entirely and give people back the time for other fun things. T

All, I wanted to mention a few items that we'll discuss on tomorrow's call to raise awareness and pre-meeting thinking: 1 - a Rust SDK has been proposed: https://github.com/slinkydeveloper/cloudevents