Given the light agenda I’ve canceled this week’s CE/Serverless WG call. The next call is scheduled for Jan 12. If you haven’t already voted, please remember to vote on going forward with the Graduated

All, We're on the verge of closing out the final (minor) issues found by our security review, so in prep for that we agreed to start a vote on going to CNCF Graduated Status (see criteria). @markpeek

If this is not the appropriate forum for this request, I apologize in advance and please ignore the rest of this email. I’m in the process of writing a book about event design guidelines, along with s

Subject: [CNCF] Greetings from Singapore Hi! My name is Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming. I am a Targeted Individual (TI) living in Singapore. I am also an IT Consultant with a Systems Integrator (

We don’t have enough topics on the agenda for a call tomorrow so I decide to cancel it – let’s regroup next week. -Doug

All – the CloudEvents/Serverless WG call for tomorrow (May 26) has been canceled since have no agenda items to discuss. Enjoy the time off! See everyone next week. -Doug

Good morning, i'd like to ask a trivial question about the cloudevents.json format. Besides <unique id> there are any other mandatory fields? Es (Source, Type..etc) Thank you in advance. Sincerely, Ma

Just sharing some interesting media data from the CNCF folks... -Doug CNCF has created the following Q4 2021 CloudEvents media and velocity report: https://app2.cision.com/report?id=c504193b-8e5a-47c3

All, Please see issue https://github.com/cloudevents/spec/issues/946 which starts a vote for the release of the Cloud Events v1.0.2 of the specifications. See the issue for eligible voting members or

All, Please see issue https://github.com/cloudevents/spec/issues/939 which starts a vote for the release of the Cloud Events Protobuf v1.0 format specification. See the issue for eligible voting membe

All, Couple of items have been added to the agenda for this week's Cloud Events call that might be interest to folks. If you can't make the call but would like to voice an opinion please add a comment

As requested, here's a reminder for the items we agreed to work on for next week's call: - Please review these issues to see if there's any reason to keep them open: 1 - Artifact Hub using Cloud Event

All, in case you missed the call today, there's a proposal to close these really old issues: Brainstorm on how to move to a "normal" LGTM PR review process Spec Conformance Tool - Service Validator To

Enjoy the conference! thanks -Doug _______________________________________________________ STSM | IBM Hybrid Cloud | OM Code Engine (919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@... The more I'm around some peo

Hello – As part of our CloudEvents specification adoption evaluation process, it would be appreciated if you can assist with responses/resources to the following: Frequency / release cycle of major ve

All, as we get PRs to fix minor things (like typos) we need to decide how to deal with them w.r.t. our github process. The challenge is that we want the default view of the repo to be the latest publi

Hi Everyone- I work on serverless at Red Hat and want to help drive adoption of CloudEvents in 2021. I have been trying to develop a list of projects that I thought would make sense as emitters of clo

I just notice that the v1.0.1 repo branch falsely contains the discovery, subscriptions, and schema registry specs. Those are not part of 1.0.1 because they’re not done. Clemens Vasters Messaging Plat

Description https://zoom.us/my/cncfserverlesswg?pwd=YjNqYzhOdjRRd01YWFkzS1lHbDZqUT09 https://zoom.us/my/cncfserverlesswg?pwd=YjNqYzhOdjRRd01YWFkzS1lHbDZqUT09